Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly considers capital appropriations for Coby Road repairs, transfer‑station improvements and brush dropoff upgrades
Summary
The assembly discussed and introduced ordinances to appropriate capital funds for road repairs on Coby Road, transfer‑station/brush‑drop improvements and other small facility projects; staff said the projects would draw from the capital improvement fund while seeking state grant matches where available.
Get email alerts on the Local Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly members considered several capital projects during the May 14 meeting, including road repairs on Coby Road, transfer‑station facility improvements and brush‑drop area upgrades. Staff described scope, available funding and procurement timelines and the assembly introduced or postponed related ordinances for later action.
Community members and staff described Coby Road conditions and the borough’s intention to use a combination of Homeland Security and Emergency Management grant funds and borough capital to complete three road segments. Administrative staff said the town received a partial award from the state and that the borough’s proposed appropriation (up to $60,000) would be used either to cover cost overages from rising prices or to pay for additive alternates not covered by the state grant, such as geotextile underlayments.
The assembly introduced Ordinance 25‑07, appropriating up to $60,000 from the capital improvement fund for Coby Road repairs and opened discussion about project timing; staff said invitations to bid would be issued this summer and that final award would follow formal appropriation at a future meeting or through the awarding process consistent with procurement rules.
The assembly also introduced Ordinance 25‑08, an appropriation of up to $60,000 for transfer‑station facility and brush drop‑off improvements (concrete pads under dumpsters, graded brush‑drop area, and coordination with the native village and DOT where surface rights overlap). That ordinance was briefly discussed and then postponed to a later meeting.
Public commenters urged use of structural gravel and larger‑screen material for long‑term road durability. Staff said project designs account for ditching and drainage and that available funding will be combined across grants and borough CIP to achieve the largest feasible scope. No final construction contracts were awarded at the May 14 meeting; staff will return with bid results and formal appropriation requests as contracts are ready to award.

