Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Music Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Norwood School Committee adopts new music curriculum, approves $139,692 in supporting expenses after debate
Summary
The Norwood School Committee voted 4–1 on May 14 to adopt Quaver for K–4 and MusicFirst/related products for grades 5–12 and to approve supporting equipment and supplies totaling $139,692. The measure drew a lone dissent over support expenses amid budget concerns.
Get email alerts on the Education Music Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Norwood School Committee on Wednesday voted to adopt a new districtwide music curriculum and approved related equipment and support purchases, clearing a combined package that includes Quaver (elementary) and MusicFirst with supplemental products for older students.
The vote approved the curriculum and $139,692 in supporting expenses 4–1 after extended discussion about whether to purchase instruments, storage racks, acoustic shells and other equipment now or delay some purchases because of budget pressures.
Committee members and district staff said the two-vendor approach (Quaver for K–4, MusicFirst and related products for grades 5–12) was selected after pilots, teacher feedback and a review of standards alignment. Jeff Kerr, director of fine arts, recommended Quaver for younger grades because it provides a detailed elementary scope-and-sequence, songs that align with staff preferences, accessibility options and a teacher dashboard. For grades 5–12 Kerr and the team recommended MusicFirst and related tools (including Sight Reading Factory and musician-learning platforms) to improve music literacy and performance skills.
Kerr described the programs as online-heavy curricula with extensive teacher supports, professional development offerings and a large library of repertoire and materials. He said sight-reading and music literacy tools have already shown improvement in student audition results and that both vendors provide professional development and ongoing online support for teachers.
Opposition focused on the supporting-equipment portion of the request rather than the curricula themselves. Committee member Joan Giblin said she supported “pure instruction” purchases but not the full set of equipment now, citing tight town finances. ‘‘If we are in a difficult budget moment, I will only go for pure instruction,’’ she said during debate. Other members pushed back that the district already budgeted for a curriculum refresh and that the package as presented fit inside previously approved budget authority.
After discussion, the committee took a single motion that combined curriculum adoption and the supporting expenses; the motion (moved by Judith Bromley, seconded by Joan Giblin for purposes of discussion) passed 4–1, with Giblin casting the lone dissent. The committee recorded the vote as 4 yes, 1 no.
District staff said they will issue purchase orders once formal adoption is recorded and intend to provide teacher access and PD over the summer so staff can begin implementing the curriculum in the fall. Some equipment purchases may be phased in as part of planned facilities or FF&E schedules.
Kerr also provided line-item quotes and said the total package was within previously approved limits for a curricular refresh. He noted some items (for example, acoustic shells and heavy equipment) may require separate procurement or MSBC/Capital approvals depending on procurement rules.
The committee did not change the curricular recommendation at the vote. Several members praised the work of the fine arts team and cited the district’s recent recognition by the NAMM Foundation as evidence of the program’s strengths.
The vote concluded the agenda item; staff will provide a procurement timeline to the committee and report back on teacher training schedules and initial implementation checks in fall.

