Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Courts Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council delays decision on Superior Court reporter reclassifications amid revenue uncertainty
Summary
Judicial officials asked the council to reclassify 10 court-reporter positions (six of which have partial federal reimbursement); after discussion the council tabled the request to await clearer state guidance and budget projections.
Judge Shively and Superior Court Administrator Sarah Wells presented a request to reclassify 10 court-reporter positions. Wells said six of the 10 positions regularly perform duties eligible for federal 4-D reimbursement (family-court work) and that those reimbursements have, in prior years, generated nearly $200,000 for the county's general fund.
Wells and Judge Lloyd described supervisory duties performed by the reporters and argued reclassification would reflect current job responsibilities. Council members voiced concern about adding recurring salary obligations at a time when the county's allowable revenue growth is constrained by state action; a council member described the total additional county cost as "about $70,000" for all ten positions.
After discussion the council voted to table the reclassification request until the budget season (council members asked that staff and the judges return with any additional data and that the council president be kept informed of state-level clarifications). The motion to table was made, seconded and carried by voice vote.
Ending: Judicial leadership said they would supply comparable rates in peer counties and additional detail on the 4-D reimbursements before the item is brought back to the council.
