Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Minnetonka council delays decision on off‑leash plan after hours of debate and public comment
Summary
After a four‑hour presentation and more than two hours of public comment, the Minnetonka City Council voted to table action on the Minnetonka off‑leash strategy and guidance plan and schedule a special study session for May 19 to develop next steps.
Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Minnetonka City Council on May 5 delayed deciding whether to implement staff and park board recommendations to permit off‑leash dog recreation in parts of Purgatory Park, voting to continue the discussion at a special study session on May 19 at 4 p.m.
The council heard a presentation from Parks and Trails Manager Marion Kumpka and police and natural‑resources staff on a proposed off‑leash strategy, a range of possible mapped areas within the city and two staff‑recommended zones in Purgatory Park. City Manager Mike Funk told the council that the issue is emotionally charged across the community: "In my 28 years in public service . . . two topics consistently rise to the top when it comes to complex and passionate public policy decisions: parking and barking," he said.
City staff described a process that included a public survey, a community working group, and recent action by the Park Board. The working group identified planning, design and operations criteria for off‑leash areas — including distance from residences, parking and ADA access, a preference for lower‑quality or invasive‑dominated habitats, and a mix of "hard" and "soft" barriers to separate off‑leash use from other park users. The Park Board forwarded an amended map that would designate substantially more acreage in Purgatory Park as off‑leash than staff's narrower recommendation.
Why it matters: Purgatory Park is about 155 acres and contains restored prairie and other natural resources that staff, the Park Board and members of the public said deserve protection. The council must balance public‑safety concerns, access for dog owners, and preservation of habitat identified in Minnetonka's Natural Resources Master Plan and the Purgatory Park master plan.
What council and staff said - Kumpka summarized the staff recommendation as two possible off‑leash areas in Purgatory Park, estimating the combined area at roughly 13–18 acres (about 8–12% of the park). He described criteria for siting off‑leash areas and told the council the working group found "no final consensus on specific location details." - Captain Meehan of the Minnetonka Police Department said enforcement will be a challenge: boundaries must be clearly defined and staff resources are limited. He described an initial push of education and visible patrols followed by a long‑term complaint‑based enforcement model. - The Park Board recommendation would have designated far more acreage — roughly 92 to 124 acres — as off‑leash under the master‑plan figure presented to the board in April.
Public comment and community positions More than two hours of public comment followed the staff presentation. Residents and organized groups presented sharply divergent views: - Dog‑owner and user groups urged retaining large, naturalized off‑leash spaces in Purgatory Park for exercise, socialization and the mental health benefits owners and pets gain from long, natural walks. Speakers representing an informal group called Paws for Parks offered to partner with the city on education, signage and volunteer patrols. - Other residents, natural‑resource professionals and volunteers urged protecting the park's restored prairie and sensitive habitats. Scientists and conservationists told the council the restored prairie supports rare pollinators and that intensive foot traffic and off‑leash dogs can degrade ground‑layer plant diversity and pollinator habitat. - Several speakers raised concerns about parking, especially on Stadola Road near one of the proposed entrances; others described personal or family safety concerns after encounters with off‑leash dogs.
Council action and next steps After more than three hours of council discussion, Councilmember Coakley moved to table the item and convene a special study session on May 19 at 4 p.m. Councilmember Wilburn seconded. The roll call vote was unanimous in favor of tabling and scheduling the study session.
Actions recorded from the meeting - Motion: Table discussion of the Minnetonka off‑leash strategy and guidance plan and convene a special study session on May 19, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. - Mover: Councilmember Coakley - Second: Councilmember Wilburn - Vote: Foster Bolton — yes; Schack — yes; Wilburn — yes; Calvert — yes; Romali — yes; Coakley — yes; Wiersom — yes - Outcome: tabled
What council asked staff to prepare Councilmembers asked staff to return with clearer options and implementation detail, including: - a proposed timeline and decision points for designating off‑leash areas, and whether smaller pilot areas could be used; - enforcement and complaint‑reporting tools so the city can collect consistent incident data; - options for minimizing ecological impacts (fencing, soft‑barrier design, location alternatives outside high‑quality prairie); and - site‑by‑site information about parking and neighborhood impacts.
The council’s action leaves Minnetonka’s existing leash rules in place pending whatever decision the council makes after the May 19 study session. Under the approach the council adopted last year and which remains on the books, dogs are subject to leash requirements citywide except in designated off‑leash areas; the designation and enforcement details are what the council will now revisit.
Ending: The council's May 19 special study session will be the next public forum to address how Minnetonka will balance off‑leash dog access with habitat protection and public safety. Staff said they will use the interim to refine maps, signage and enforcement concepts and to return with specific recommendations at that meeting.

