Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Lancaster County attorney reviews ex parte rules, executive sessions and appeal timelines for BZA
Summary
County Attorney Jenny Merritt DuPont told the Lancaster County Board of Zoning Appeals the board must avoid ex parte contacts, hold deliberations in public, and follow statutory timelines for appeals and mediation; she also explained when executive session is permitted and urged strong recordkeeping.
Jenny Merritt DuPont, Lancaster County attorney, told the Lancaster County Board of Zoning Appeals on a regularly scheduled meeting that board members must avoid private communications about pending cases, keep deliberations public, and follow state law when appeals or pre‑litigation mediation arise.
DuPont told the five‑member board that because the BZA is a quasi‑judicial body the county attorney ‘‘cannot simultaneously represent the fact finder’’ on a particular case and provide substantive advice that would favor one party. She said the county attorney can advise the board on procedure but not on how to apply law or criteria to a case before the board.
That distinction is central to how members may interact with staff and applicants. DuPont said board members ‘‘shall not discuss any case pending before the board with parties of record or other interested persons except as part of a public hearing concerning that case,’’ citing an opinion from the state attorney general. When asked whether a member may call staff for additional information about a specific hearing, she responded plainly: "You cannot do that. No, sir." She and staff…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

