Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

County staff oppose proposed shift of foster‑home licensing to state office

May 03, 2025 | Deschutes County, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County staff oppose proposed shift of foster‑home licensing to state office
Paul Partridge, who supervises the county’s Community Developmental Disability Program (CDDP), told the Board of Commissioners that a budget proposal in the governor’s revised package would shift foster‑home licensing duties from county programs to the state Office of Developmental Disabilities Services (ODDS).

Partridge said the proposal would move roughly 38 county full‑time equivalent positions into fewer state positions (about 20), and that the state projected roughly $2,000,000 in savings. “We worry that centralizing that duty…is going to impact the relationships that our office has with our local providers,” Partridge said.

Why it matters: County staff argued local licensing provides technical assistance and quicker local responses that state offices have not consistently delivered. Holly, a county staff member, told commissioners the state has “not shown to really do a good job with it” and remains behind on other oversight work. County staff said the proposed savings estimate has not been shared as a transparent fiscal impact study.

County members raised practical concerns about service quality and access. Commissioners asked whether statewide intake or assistance lines had long waits; Holly said wait times remained a problem and that the county had “just stopped complaining about it.” Partridge said county leaders had not pursued public testimony on that specific change in part because doing so might affect other county budget asks before Ways and Means.

Next steps: Staff planned to brief legislators during the delegation’s next in‑person meetings and to prepare a short one‑page set of talking points for those conversations. Partridge and local advocates said they will seek direct meetings with the delegation to explain local operational impacts and request reconsideration of centralization without a clear quality‑assurance plan.

Ending: County staff and supervisors framed their position as a request for more information and a transparent fiscal justification from ODDS before any licensing duties are shifted from local offices.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Oregon articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI