Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Prc Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fairfax County staff outlines PRC amendment that would allow small facility upgrades without full PRC plan; Reston board raises questions
Summary
Fairfax County Planning staff presented proposed changes to Planned Residential Community (PRC) rules that would allow some community facilities and accessory structures to be approved administratively. Reston Association directors pressed staff on how the changes would affect RA facilities such as pools, enclosures and court enclosures.
Get email alerts on the Prc Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fairfax County planning staff presented proposed edits to PRC regulations and answered Reston Association directors' questions about how the changes would affect recreational facilities and community open space.
Bill Malan of Fairfax County's Department of Planning and Development described a multi-step outreach and drafting process; county staff said earlier white papers and a March revision had informed the current draft. Malan said the draft seeks to let certain changes to PRC community facilities be processed without a full PRC plan, while keeping larger or more impactful changes subject to the PRC public-hearing process.
Key elements in staff's draft: - PRC plan exceptions for small community facilities: staff proposed a one-time new building or addition for community facilities and RA-managed common open space up to 2,500 square feet without a PRC plan (March draft had proposed 2,000 square feet; staff increased the threshold in the March-to-May update). - Minor modifications and minor variations: for nonresidential/multifamily uses, staff proposed using the county's existing minor modification process to approve limited building additions, parking increases and other small adjustments administratively. - Temporary structures: county staff said structures described as temporary are allowed for up to one year without a PRC plan; repeated seasonal use or structures kept year-to-year would more likely trigger PRC plan requirements. - Examples: staff listed small accessory structures such as picnic shelters and playground equipment as examples that could be handled administratively. Staff noted that additions or enclosures above the square-foot thresholds would still require a PRC plan.
Directors' concerns and examples: Board members pressed county staff about how the draft would apply to several Reston Association projects under discussion, including enclosing the Lake Newport tennis courts (plans showed an increase of roughly 10,000 square feet in one illustration) and enclosing the Lake Newport 50-meter pool. Directors also raised proposals for seasonal bubbles over heated pools and indoor batting tunnels (a board example sized at about 3,700 square feet). Staff said projects over the 2,500-square-foot threshold would require a PRC plan and public hearing; temporary seasonal enclosures used year after year would not be considered temporary under the proposal and could trigger PRC-plan level review.
Why it matters: Reston Association operates multiple community facilities that members have asked to upgrade or enclose. The staff draft would make many modest upgrades easier to approve administratively but would not exempt larger enclosures or permanent new buildings from the PRC plan process. Directors repeatedly emphasized that if RA were to fund or pursue designs requiring a PRC plan, the time and expense could be substantial and could affect feasibility.
Next steps: County staff said their plan is to request authorization to publish the draft and proceed through hearings this summer. Reston Association directors asked staff to review specific designs (architectural and civil engineering plans) before the county's text is finalized, to confirm whether planned upgrades at Lake Newport or other sites would be eligible for administrative approval or would require a PRC plan and public hearings.

