Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mixed Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Group refines mixed-use guidance and debates building heights, mountain views and compatibility
Summary
Advisory-group members supported targeting mixed-use development to major intersections and commercial corridors, recommended revisions for parking, lighting, shared parking and signage, and debated whether the plan should include a blanket three‑story limit or a more flexible approach tied to views and compatibility.
Staff presented draft goals, policies and actions for mixed-use development and compatibility; Malini Sims asked the group to comment on locations, parking standards, lighting, and building heights.
Several participants recommended directing mixed-use to major intersections and marketplace locations. "Support appropriate mixed use development on major intersections" received general agreement; Hal (Resident/Working Group member) suggested the Oracle/El Conquistador intersection as a potential area and raised Oracle/Pushview Lane as the Mercado del Rio area under discussion. Participants also pushed for shared parking, reduced asphalt coverage and attention to noise, odors and sign scale. "Lighting" was raised repeatedly as a needed addition to the design and compatibility policies.
The most contested issue was building height. The draft guiding principle included a numeric cap ("no more than three stories") intended to protect views; some participants, including Don (Resident/Working Group member), urged removing a blanket numerical cap and allowing taller buildings only in "select" sites where views and topography would not be affected. Other participants, including Sue (Resident/Working Group member) and Colleen, said protecting mountain and scenic corridor views was a high priority and argued for retaining strong limits on taller apartment buildings. Sims said the working group includes more detailed actions and policies that restrict apartments over three stories and that staff would consider elevating the guiding principle language to a high-level statement about protecting views and neighborhood compatibility while keeping specific height constraints in the actions.
No formal vote was taken; staff said they will revise wording to remove the numeric cap from the guiding principle and to ensure that actions and policies clearly limit apartment heights, address bulk and scale, and require compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods.
