Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Branding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Oroville arts commissioners reopen discussion on city seal, favor new design contest
Summary
The Oroville Arts Commission revisited an earlier city seal redesign and by consensus directed staff to research the prior campaign and explore launching a new community design contest tied to the city's 120th anniversary in 2026.
The Oroville Arts Commission revisited plans to update the city seal and agreed by consensus to have staff review the earlier design campaign and explore a renewed public contest.
Commissioner Krantz, who brought the item to the meeting, said the commission had selected a rendering in a campaign more than two years ago but that city council requested a minor addition. “I think it would be really great if we could have this done to correlate with our hundred and twentieth anniversary or birthday as a city, which is in 2026,” Krantz said. She told the commission the original artist said the requested addition was “a very easy addition” and remained willing to do the work.
The commission discussed whether to proceed with the previously selected rendering or start a fresh campaign now that commission membership and city staff have changed. Commissioners raised timing, outreach and scope questions: whether a new seal would appear only on printed materials, on welcome signs at city limits, or on vehicle and facility signage, and whether updating the seal citywide would be a large undertaking.
Several commissioners supported a new competition that would invite fresh ideas, including outreach to local schools and a modest honorarium or scholarship for student winners. One commissioner suggested following a model used by a local public-art program that reaches out to schools and offers recognition and small compensation.
Because the item was not agendized for a formal vote, the commission did not take a motion. A staff member said commissioners could provide direction to staff without re‑agendizing; the group reached consensus for staff to locate records of the prior campaign, contact the previous artist for historical context, and return with options for restarting a new contest.
The commission asked staff to bring background materials to the next meeting so members could consider scope, outreach and potential budget implications before formalizing a program.
