Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Plan Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orem council and planning commission review general‑plan priorities; land use, State Street and housing data flagged
Summary
City staff and the planning commission briefed the council on the general plan update, asking for guidance on priorities including land use maps, State Street redevelopment, housing inventory data and transportation sequencing.
City planning staff and members of the Planning Commission held a joint session with the Orem City Council to discuss the general plan update, identify high‑priority work program items and request clearer policy guidance on land use, housing and downtown redevelopment.
Planning staff said the general plan process is identifying gaps between the plan’s projected land‑use map and existing zoning and development patterns on the ground. Staff described workstream timing: land‑use elements continuing in May, transportation scheduled for June, water and related infrastructure in June, housing beginning by July, and parks, public services and urban design to follow. Staff said the schedule will require some double‑up work sessions during the summer and that final‑draft work was likely to slip into late summer.
Commissioners said they need clearer definitions of density categories (low, medium, high) and a better inventory of existing housing stock — the number of single‑family, attached and multifamily units, ages, lot sizes and nonconforming lots — to ground land‑use decisions. Commission members asked staff for a housing‑type study and suggested staff bring representative boards and commissions (parks, utilities, historic preservation) into planning discussions as sections reach relevant topics.
Council members and commissioners discussed State Street and downtown strategy. Several participants said the city’s prior State Street master plan had constrained private investment in the past because code provisions required upgrades that were financially prohibitive; they urged a new approach that balances preservation of existing business owners’ investments with targeted revitalization. Participants proposed clearer, purpose‑specific commercial zones (for example a medical‑use district near hospital facilities) rather than a single broad commercial category.
Transportation and emergency services were cited as critical constraints for some future development. Council members urged planners to incorporate fire and police access considerations into transportation planning and to identify traffic bottlenecks (participants cited several intersections) as part of the transportation master plan update.
Staff asked council members to clarify high‑priority goals (for existing resident quality of life, housing affordability, and commercial/retail economic drivers) so the plan can set targets that guide subsequent zoning and code changes. Staff said it will return with a work program prioritizing issues and requested the planning commission and relevant advisory bodies meet with council members as individual plan elements come up for review.
