Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
ZBA grants area variances for 13 Wizzwall Lane; approval conditioned on existing structure
Summary
The Zoning Board approved a set of area variances for 13 Wizzwall Lane, allowing conversion work that includes lot size, width, coverage, setbacks and impervious surface variances; approval applies only to the existing structure and expires if the structure is demolished.
The Saratoga Springs Zoning Board of Appeals voted May 12 to approve multiple area variances for renovation at 13 Wizzwall Lane, an application from property owner John Witt.
The board approved variances for minimum lot size (relief of 4,004 square feet or ~50.1%), minimum lot width (20 feet relief, 25%), maximum lot coverage (relief of 29%, requested 69% coverage), front and rear setback relief, side setbacks, and maximum impervious surface (proposed 78% vs. 70% allowed). The motion included a condition that the variances "shall remain in effect for this existing structure only" and that the approval "shall be deemed to have expired and no longer be in effect" if the structure is demolished.
During the hearing, the applicant presented modifications to improve permeability, including adding a grass strip and permeable pavers that would lower effective imperviousness from earlier plans. Board members noted the revised plan modestly improved conditions and that the application was similar to a previously approved plan (202300281) for the same property; the board also recorded that the applicant failed to request an 18-month extension previously and had to reapply.
The board's roll-call vote was recorded as follows: Christopher LaPointe — in favor; Jonah Cohen — in favor; Shafer Gaskin — in favor; Amanda Dema — in favor; Brendan Daly — in favor; Gage Simpson — in favor. Otis Maxwell was absent. The board chair summarized findings under the statutory five-factor area-variance test, including achievability by other means and environmental impacts, and concluded the requested variances were substantial but mitigated by neighborhood character and the preexisting nature of the structure. The motion passed by recorded vote.
