Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Audit Reports topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council auditor follow-ups flag remaining issues in real estate and building inspection audits

3257381 · May 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council auditor staff presented two follow-up reports (832B and 805B) showing several unresolved issues: unreconciled capital assets and surplus properties in the real estate audit, and access-rights, fee and escrow reconciliation problems in the Building Inspection Division audit.

A representative of the City Council auditor’s office presented two follow-up audit reports to the True Commission.

Report 832B (real estate audit follow-up) was described as the second follow-up to an earlier audit. The auditor’s representative said the original audit identified 16 issues; the first follow-up cleared nine, and the second follow-up cleared four more, leaving three unresolved issues. The remaining items include unreconciled capitalized land and building assets (168 properties identified originally), disposition and acquisition journal entries not reflected on the balance sheet, and 129 surplus properties not disposed in a timely manner out of a larger universe of potentially surplus properties (the auditor cited 2,463 potential surplus properties citywide).

Report 805B (building inspection division follow-up) also showed outstanding findings. The original audit raised 22 issues; follow-ups cleared some but left 10 outstanding. Those include access-rights controls (77 terminated employees still had system access and 19 outside-division staff had access they should not), incomplete standard operating procedures (SOPs), reinspection-fee charging and double-fee compliance gaps when work begins before permits, manual adjustments causing errors in plan-review fee calculations, escrow-account reconciliation shortcomings, and inconsistent use of the Florida Administrative Code form for private-provider inspections.

Commissioners asked whether lists of affected properties were available; the auditor’s representative said she would coordinate with the real estate office to provide lists or further materials. The audit representative noted both reports had been released recently and that distribution to the commission would be confirmed. The True Commission did not take any final vote on audit findings during the presentation; commissioners requested follow-up documentation and clarified how audit materials would be circulated.

Votes at a glance: the commission recorded a procedural motion earlier in the meeting to approve minutes ("Move to approve the minutes. Second.") that passed by voice vote with commissioners responding "Aye." The motion and vote were recorded in the meeting transcript but no roll-call tally was provided.

Why it matters: unresolved audit findings involve fixed-asset accounting, surplus property disposition and permitting controls, items that affect financial reporting, asset stewardship and public safety regulatory compliance. Commissioners requested lists and additional follow-up from the auditor and affected departments.