Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council rejects ordinance to move Rio Rancho municipal elections into county-run November cycle
Summary
After nearly 20 public speakers — the majority opposing — the Council voted 3–3 to defeat O13, an ordinance that would have shifted Rio Rancho municipal elections into the state’s regular local (November odd-year) cycle and removed the city’s local photo-ID requirement.
The Rio Rancho Governing Body voted to reject Ordinance O13 — a proposed opt-in to the state’s regular local election calendar and attendant changes to municipal terms — after public comment and roll-call voting produced a tie against adoption.
Deputy city staff summarized the ordinance on second reading, saying adoption would opt the city into county-run November elections, change the timing of candidate filings and extend current officeholders’ terms to align future local elections with state-administered cycles. Staff told the council that 97 of 106 New Mexico municipalities already participate in the regular local election and that consolidation is intended to save the city money and increase voter turnout; staff estimated the city could save roughly $450,000 by not holding a standalone March municipal election in 2026.
Many speakers opposed the change and urged the council to preserve the city charter’s local photo-identification requirement for municipal elections, saying the charter-protected voter-ID requirement was approved by Rio Rancho voters in 2012. Public commenters argued the city should retain local control over municipal elections rather than shift administration to the county and state. Speakers also raised concerns about election security, state-level election administration practices, and potential conflicts of interest when elected officials’ terms are extended.
After public comment, the council considered the ordinance. The roll-call vote recorded three yes votes (Councilors Japs0n/Dapson, Weimer, and Culbreth) and three no votes (Councilors Tyler, List and Linnentine) with the mayor recused on the item; the tie vote caused the ordinance to fail.
Councilors who supported the opt-in cited cost savings and the practical efficiencies of consolidated election administration; opponents focused on preserving the city charter’s photo-ID requirement and the principle of local control. The failure of the ordinance means Rio Rancho will continue to administer its municipal elections under the current city charter and calendar, including the local photo-ID provision, unless the governing body or voters pursue a separate change in the future.
