Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Healthcare Professional Licensing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee hears AB56 to update licensing rules for physicians and physician assistants, streamline credentialing
Summary
Assembly Bill 56 would remove a bioterrorism continuing-education requirement, modestly raise licensing fees, add an inactive-fee option for physician assistants and allow the medical board to share primary-source verification to speed credentialing, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners told the Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor.
The Senate Committee on Commerce and Labor heard a presentation on Assembly Bill 56 from the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners, which described the bill as a mix of statutory cleanups and administrative updates intended to align chapters governing physician and physician-assistant licensure.
Sarah Bradley, deputy executive director of the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners, told the committee AB56 removes a continuing-medical-education (CME) requirement tied specifically to bioterrorism that had been added after the 2001 terrorist attacks, saying the courses would remain available but would not be mandatory. “The CMEs will still be allowed… We’re just removing the requirement that they take them,” Bradley said, explaining the change was intended to reduce duplicative burdens on licensees.
Bradley said the bill includes modest increases to licensing fees for physicians and physician assistants, some of which have not been adjusted since the late 1990s and early 2000s. The bill adds an inactive registration option for physician assistants; under AB56 an inactive physician assistant would pay one-half of the active registration fee (aligning that PA option with the current physician practice), she said.
A key administrative change in the bill, Bradley told the committee, is an amendment to NRS 630.336 that would permit the medical board to share primary-source documentation and other verifications obtained during licensure with credentialers and employers. The board said the change aims to accelerate credentialing once an applicant is licensed so new clinicians can begin work more quickly.
Bradley also said AB56 aligns the Board of Osteopathic Medicine’s renewal cycle with the medical-examiners board by moving that board from an annual to a biennial renewal cycle and adjusting fees accordingly. The bill further adds a ground for discipline if an applicant provides incorrect information on an application, bringing that chapter closer to existing medical-board authority.
Committee members asked clarifying questions about the bioterrorism CME removal and the rationale for fee changes; Bradley said the CME content would remain an option but removing the mandate reduces burden, and that fee adjustments are intended to reflect historical under-indexed amounts and to create parity between license types. There was no opposition testimony in person or by phone; the committee closed the hearing on AB56 without taking a recorded vote.
The committee proceeded to public comment and adjourned for the day after completing the scheduled items.
