Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Jose to pursue development‑service improvements and CEQA process changes; Coyote Valley CEQA work deferred
Summary
City staff proposed reorganizing community and economic development programs to emphasize job creation, downtown vitality and workforce development, and said they will pursue permitting and CEQA process improvements while prioritizing a four‑year general‑plan review; staff also said CEQA work on the Coyote Valley corridor will be deferred.
Get email alerts on the Development Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff told the council May 7 that the Community and Economic Development city service area will reorient some programs to prioritize jobs, downtown vitality, cultural activation and talent development, and that staff are pursuing targeted process improvements to speed permitting and environmental review.
The administration presented an updated service model for the Office of Economic Development and Cultural Affairs and related departments, proposing to shift from 5 core program groupings and 19 programs to 4 core services and 14 programs aligned with council economic objectives. Staff said the reorganization is intended to strengthen real‑estate strategy, cultural activation and workforce development while aligning development services to high‑impact goals.
Chris Burton, Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement (PBCE), told the council the number of development review project managers has declined from roughly 20 in earlier years to about six, reflecting shifts in demand and a fee‑funded staffing model. Burton described ongoing internal and procedural changes that staff said are intended to reduce cycle time for permits and environmental reviews, including implementing prior recommendations from PBCE’s 2022 process audit.
To support the work, staff proposed filling an existing planner‑level vacancy (Planner 4) and reallocating some funding so that the city can hire and retain technical staff needed for CEQA and permitting tasks. The vice mayor asked for specifics about how one‑time funding and the staffing shift would support CEQA streamlining; Burton said funding would be used to fill the long‑vacant Planner 4 role and to implement process improvements and templates developed since the 2022 audit.
Staff said the city will undertake a four‑year general‑plan review and use that process to address land‑use questions and ensure alignment with housing element requirements. In that context, the presentation explained that the CEQA study for the Coyote Valley corridor will be deferred while the department prioritizes the four‑year review and other state obligations. Staff said the Singleton landfill and other city‑owned sites were examined as possible relocation sites for the Barrie flea market, but the state surplus‑land requirements and remediation constraints complicate federal/state approvals; staff said more information would be provided to council in a separate report next week.
Burton also highlighted that legal engagement often occurs before formal litigation — for example, developer and stakeholder attorneys frequently engage around “builder’s remedy” projects — and staff said some applicants prioritize high‑impact housing and affordable‑housing projects in permit pipelines because of funding timelines.
Staff will issue a manager’s budget addendum with additional detail on the proposed program realignment, performance measures and a prioritized referrals list for council consideration, and staff said they will continue to return to the council with progress reports and recommendations.

