Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kalispell reviews budget priorities: finance software, meters, treatment-plant repairs and street projects
Summary
City staff outlined proposed budget items and capital projects including a finance software upgrade, replacement of water meters, treatment-plant repairs, street resurfacing and vehicle/equipment purchases; council discussed timing and contingencies but took no final appropriation votes.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff presented a broad budget and capital-project update Tuesday to the Kalispell City Council, highlighting planned investments in finance software and staffing, water and sewer capital work, meter replacements, street maintenance and public-works equipment.
Staff emphasized several near-term items: upgrading finance software and possibly adding finance department capacity to streamline budgeting and reporting; continuing a meter-replacement program that the city said is roughly 55% complete and replaces about 1,200 meters over multiple years; and several water and wastewater capital projects to replace aging pumps and wells and to rehabilitate treatment-plant equipment, including fermenter rehabilitation and an equalization basin project.
On utilities, presenters warned of notable operating cost increases in electricity and equipment repairs. The water utility budget includes a line for an estimated replacement of a major well motor (staff said a recent motor replacement carries a material cost), and the wastewater plan identified algae growth in secondary clarifiers as a maintenance issue and described planned clarifier repairs and screening improvements.
Public-works topics included a discussion of mill-and-overlay, chip-seal and reconstruction estimates, and an item to consolidate equipment in a central garage or to acquire property for storage and staging of vehicles and materials. Staff said some capital equipment ordered in prior years had not yet arrived, and several council members discussed how unspent balances carry forward and how to prioritize projects during the remaining budget process.
Staff also discussed funding sources and project sequencing: impact fees, grants, tax-increment financing (TIF) and developer contributions were identified as potential sources for growth-related infrastructure; staff recommended advancing project plans and returning to council with priorities and possible timing to match revenue availability.
No formal votes or appropriations were recorded in the transcript excerpt. Council members asked clarifying questions about contingency, carryover funds and implementation timing and asked staff to return with additional detail for final budget decisions.
Next steps: staff will continue refining cost estimates, bring back project prioritization and financing options during the budget process, and provide more detail on contingency amounts and carryover balances for council consideration.

