Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 12 Education Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews administrative‑review placements and special‑education out‑of‑district placements
Summary
Administrators briefed the board on the district’s administrative review process for disciplinary and special‑education placements, reporting 54 administrative reviews this year, seven expulsions and roughly 59 out‑of‑district placements for which the district is financially responsible.
District administrators gave a detailed briefing on how the Chambersburg Area School District handles disciplinary administrative reviews and special‑education placements outside district facilities.
Kurt (administrator) explained the administrative review process: building‑level reviews escalate to an administrative review for repeated discipline incidents or automatic triggers (weapons, drug sales, terroristic threats). An administrative review team — typically involving the superintendent, school psychologist, sending‑school principal and counselor — recommends outcomes ranging from additional in‑building supports to placement in district behavior classrooms, the DAO program, CVA, or out‑of‑district specialized programs.
Key facts presented - Volume and outcomes: The district reported 54 administrative reviews this school year; seven cases resulted in expulsions with waivers signed by parents (the board still approves expulsions). Several students returned to their home schools with additional supports; some were placed in behavior, social‑emotional or virtual placements. - Placements and responsibility: Administrators listed roughly 71 placements overall, with 59 students for whom the district is currently financially responsible for out‑of‑district education. Examples of out‑of‑district placements mentioned included River Rock (flexible study program), the AEDY program in Carlisle (alternative education for disruptive youth), Yellow Breeches seat allotments for special‑education placements, and other specialized programs across the state. The district noted that many out‑of‑district placements are for students with individualized special‑education needs. - Process safeguards: For students with IEPs who face disciplinary action, administrators described the required manifestation determination process and the separate meetings that precede administrative reviews for special‑education students.
Board members asked for clarifications about education while incarcerated (IU often provides services), the types of placements and how decisions are made for students with different levels of need and probation status. Administrators reiterated that placement decisions are individualized and typically involve IEP teams, school psychologists and relevant supervisors.
Ending: The board received the overview; administrators said the information will support future contract approvals and highlighted the individualized nature of many placements.
