Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Center Remodel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Berrien County pauses contract award as $5.3 million juvenile center remodel goes to bid
Summary
Presentations and bids for a $5.3 million remodel of the county juvenile center advanced, but county administration told commissioners it will not award a construction contract until the courts provide information about bed use and occupancy plans; ARPA funds and county fund balance are available to pay for work already scoped.
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Center Remodel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Berrien County commissioners heard detailed plans and bids for a $5,300,000 renovation of the county juvenile center and were told the board will not award a construction contract until the county receives additional information from the courts about bed needs and program plans.
The board received a presentation from Matt Davis of Whiteman and Nick White of Ignite, who provided an evaluation and bid package for the remodel, and from Curtis Penny of Eckert Wardell, who presented a proposed remodel for the South County health facility. Davis told commissioners the HVAC at the juvenile center is original to 1973 and must be upgraded; plumbing and the fire-protection system must be brought up to current local code because the scope of work triggers those requirements. Bids were released and are expected back in June.
County administration told the board the design services contract is the only formal commitment so far and that bid award will be deferred until the board has information from the court about the facility’s expected use. Administration said American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) dollars previously directed to general fund balance and identified for deferred maintenance are available to pay for the project if the board so decides.
Why it matters: Commissioners asked whether the $5.3 million estimate—when compared with the center’s secured capacity—represents an efficient use of county funds. One commissioner calculated a per-bed figure (based on a maximum of 14 secure beds) and asked whether buying an existing facility would be a lower-cost option.
Administration and the court administrator told the board they are preparing materials about average daily costs for out-of-county placements, availability of out-of-county beds, and the court’s plan to repopulate the facility. Administration said that information will be provided to the board before any contract award so commissioners can weigh alternatives, including whether to renovate the existing building, to acquire a different facility, or to pursue out-of-county placements.
The presentation materials estimate the project’s major elements as: electrical upgrades, HVAC replacement, plumbing work, expanded fire protection, and separate work on well and septic systems. Commissioners were told the South County health-department remodel is roughly $1 million and is a separate project also moving forward.
Commissioners and administration repeatedly stressed that only design services have been contracted and that the board has not committed to fund or award construction beyond that design work. Administration said the county’s deferred-maintenance fund balance includes ARPA-derived amounts that are available for the project if the board chooses to use them.
Looking ahead, administration will deliver the court’s occupancy and cost materials to the board before any contract award, and the county will review bid responses when they return in June. No construction contract award was made at the meeting.

