Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Echo Point site plan (Scott Jensen) tabled pending water, well and deed verification
Summary
Fairfield — The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled a site-plan application for the Echo Point (Scott Jensen/ECO) project after staff and commissioners found the submittal lacked verification of water shares, well locations, deed evidence, grading, and an arsenic test or documentation.
Fairfield — The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled a site-plan application for the Echo Point (Scott Jensen/ECO) project after staff and commissioners identified multiple checklist items missing from the submittal.
Commissioners and staff said they could not confirm the location of any production wells or whether water shares are tied to the parcel. “He was supposed to verify that he has water shares that is tied to his well,” a staff member said; the applicant did not provide that proof during the meeting. Commissioners also asked for a warranty deed or formal legal description and for any arsenic testing connected to past environmental work. A staff member noted a public-health arsenic report from 2011 had previously been prepared for the area.
On fire protection, the county fire marshal reviewed the plan and said greenhouses on the site were not combustible, so the marshal did not require a new hydrant; commissioners recorded a distance of 439 feet from an existing hydrant and took comfort from the fire marshal’s comments. That said, the commission said the absence of complete grading, contour and grading plans meant they could not reliably evaluate access, wells, or septic/leach-field siting.
Outcome and next steps: The commission tabled the application “based on the insufficiencies of the checklist,” listing missing items that must be submitted before reconsideration: verification of water shares and well locations, deed/warranty information, an arsenic report or documentation if one exists, a grading plan with existing contours and elevations, and confirmation of septic handling. The transcript records the commission’s desire for a more complete DRC (development review committee) list of outstanding items so staff can issue a clear denial or conditional tabling; commissioners were frustrated that some materials were received late.
Why it matters: Commissioners said water and septic are fundamental constraints in the AR‑10 zoning district and that selling individual units or parcels without clear water and sewer arrangements would be premature. The applicant and his representatives left the meeting without approval and were told to return with the requested verifications.
