Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge stronger voter rolls and voter ID at county, cite Rio Rancho council debate
Summary
Several residents used Sandoval County's public comment period to raise concerns about voter rolls, voter ID and election integrity, pointing to a contentious Rio Rancho council meeting on May 8 as part of their remarks. Commissioners acknowledged the comments but did not take formal action at the meeting.
Multiple residents raised election-related concerns during the public-comment portion of the Sandoval County commission meeting on May 14, citing what they described as "dirty voter rolls," unrestricted DMV voter registration and a recent Rio Rancho council discussion about voter identification.
Micah Sandoval (identified in public comment as "Micah Sandoval") called for his remarks to be placed in the record and accused officials of "secret meetings behind the scenes to remove voter I.D." The comments reflected an ongoing line of public testimony about election administration rather than a specific county action.
Dan Chavez said groups such as Judicial Watch have pursued court actions about voter-roll maintenance and argued that some jurisdictions have more registered voters than voting-age residents. "In some states, including New Mexico, it is as simple as checking a box that you would like to register to vote and you become registered automatically," Chavez said, urging better verification at DMV-based registration.
Mary Jo Street described the May 8 Rio Rancho City Council meeting as having large public turnout and said voter-ID proposals there drew extensive public comment. "The council viewed the importance of listening, not just hearing the passionate sentiments of each citizen," Street said. John Veltri, who also spoke about the Rio Rancho meeting, said he is working with staff at the state secretary of state's office and local officials to better understand next steps.
Commissioners did not take formal action on election procedures during the meeting. Commissioners acknowledged the speakers and encouraged continued public engagement; the county said it will forward concerns to appropriate officials as appropriate.
Ending: The comments were recorded for the public record; no county policy changes or votes on election administration were made at the May 14 meeting.
