Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget And Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Agoura Hills council narrows goal funding after staff flags $150,000 general-fund cap
Summary
City staff presented a conservative sales- and property-tax forecast and told the council roughly $150,000 in general-fund discretionary dollars is likely available for new goals, prompting council debate on priorities for two fiscal years.
Agoura Hills City Council approved the workshop agenda 5-0 before discussing goals and the budget outlook for the next two fiscal years. Mayor Pro Tem Wolf made the motion and Councilmember Deborah Klein Lopez seconded; the full council voted aye on the roll call.
City Manager Nathan Hamburger and finance staff presented an early-stage budget outlook and detailed revenue forecasts for sales and property tax, telling the council staff is taking a conservative approach given national and state economic uncertainty. Staff said the city’s sales tax rate inside city limits is 9.75% and noted recent changes in local sales-tax measures, and that the city’s share of next year’s property-tax revenue is estimated at $3,650,000 (a 3.5% increase over the current year) based on a 2% CPI factor and property transfers.
Hamburger said the city will likely have about $150,000 available from the general fund for new or expanded goals and that many recommended items proposed by subcommittees will not fit inside that constraint without reprioritizing or moving costs into later years or special funds. He asked the council to identify top priorities so staff can prepare the June budget.
Staff also briefed the council on several grants and projects that affect near-term budgeting: a federal microgrid grant for the civic center (the city has completed application requirements but is still waiting for the grant agreement), and the Ladyface Greenway project for which the city has used short-term borrowing to front grant-funded work and will seek reimbursement (the city’s only ongoing cost is interest). Staff noted some goals can be funded from special funds (for example Measure W or the solid-waste fund) rather than from the general fund.
Councilmembers requested options and lower-cost alternatives for several proposed items and directed staff to continue refinement. Councilmembers repeatedly asked staff to seek grant or partner funding where possible and to report back with reduced-cost options at the next budget workshop.
Votes at the start of the workshop
- Motion to approve the workshop agenda: moved by Mayor Pro Tem Wolf; seconded by Councilmember Deborah Klein Lopez. Roll-call vote: Anderson — Aye; Anstead — Aye; Klein Lopez — Aye; Mayor Pro Tem Wolf — Aye; Mayor Sylvester — Aye. Outcome: approved 5-0.
What happens next
Staff will return to the council with a refined list of priorities and cost options for the June budget meeting and will hold an intervening finance subcommittee meeting to review details.
