Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Oversight Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee amends ordinance to require annual independent audits for county boards that expend public funds, adds exhibit listing covered boards
Summary
The Appropriations Committee amended an ordinance to remove discretion over whether audits must be completed and directed staff to produce an exhibit identifying boards subject to the requirement and showing funding sources for audits.
The Appropriations Committee on May 6 amended an ordinance that would authorize the chairperson of county boards and the county mayor or mayor’s designee to require annual independent financial audits of county boards and offices. Commissioner Cohen Higgins moved an amendment to clarify that completion of audits is not subject to the discretion of the chairperson or the county mayor or designee; the motion passed unanimously on a voice/roll call.
Committee members and OMB staff debated scope and funding. Commissioners asked which boards would be covered and how audit costs would be paid. David Clodfelter, OMB, said some boards are already required to obtain and fund independent audits (the committee discussed the Miami‑Dade Homeless Trust as an example), and others are included in the county’s general‑fund audit performed by the comptroller. Several commissioners asked staff to prepare an exhibit listing which boards already have audit obligations and which additional boards the ordinance would cover if adopted; the sponsor agreed to add that exhibit and to clarify funding language in the ordinance.
Sponsor remarks said the item aims to ensure uniform financial oversight of boards that handle public dollars, and the amendment removes language permitting chairpersons or the mayor’s designee to withhold completion of audits. Committee members asked for thresholds or exclusions for advisory boards with minimal expenditures so small bodies that only host events or purchase supplies are not subject to disproportionate audit costs.
Why it matters: The change would expand uniform, independent financial oversight of boards and entities that expend county funds, but commissioners asked for a clear list of covered bodies and a funding plan to avoid unintended costs for small advisory entities.
Next steps: The sponsor will provide amended language and an exhibit identifying boards subject to audits and their funding mechanisms before the item advances further in the legislative process.
