Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conditional-use permit request (Case 2502) for tiny homes discussed for Ketchikan Gateway Borough property
Summary
Meeting participants discussed a conditional-use permit application (Case No. 2502) to allow tiny homes and a studio apartment on a property described in the transcript as "Lehi 6 9 E Tract E." The transcript records questions about lot-line encroachment; no formal vote or final decision appears in the provided segments.
A request for a conditional-use permit, identified in the transcript as Case No. 2502, to allow tiny homes and a studio apartment on a property in Ketchikan Gateway Borough was presented and discussed during the meeting.
Meeting participants described the proposal as involving tiny homes and a studio apartment on the site identified in the transcript as "Lehi 6 9 E Tract E." Speakers raised the issue of lot-line encroachment and whether the proposal complied with zoning requirements for the parcel. The transcript also includes an itemized announcement of the case: "Next up is case nummer 2502, It's request for conditional use Prermit for," attributed in the record to Speaker 3, a staff member.
The transcript records several short statements about the project and site. One speaker characterized the project as involving "tiny homes," while another speaker referenced a possible lot-line encroachment and the need to clarify property boundaries. The transcript contains an additional property reference phrased as "locatedd uit 1937 Mod bij de Catch Cangaway Buro an april elfdend 2020," language that is unclear in the record; the date and exact meaning of that phrase were not specified in the transcript excerpts provided.
No formal motion, vote tally, approval, or denial for Case No. 2502 appears in the supplied transcript segments. The discussion as recorded focused on clarifying the proposal type (tiny homes and a studio unit), confirming the case number, and noting concerns about encroachment over lot lines. The transcript did not include documentation of any final action, nor did it provide a full staff report, recommended conditions, or a recorded vote in the excerpts supplied.
The record supplied is limited and contains partial or fragmented phrasing. Where the transcript is unclear, this article reports the wording as given (for example, the site name and a date-style phrase) and notes that those items were not specified or clarified in the provided segments.
Follow-up items implied by the discussion that were not completed in the supplied excerpts include formal zoning determination, mapping or survey confirmation of lot lines, and any formal decision by the appropriate permitting authority.
