Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears first reads for staff-conduct and sex-offender-notification policies after district incident
Summary
The board received first readings of policy updates to GBEBB (staff conduct with students) and JLIF (sex-offender notification). A board member urged explicit language banning staff solicitation of explicit images and requiring annual training; staff agreed to accept recommended language for second read.
Get email alerts on the Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The governing board reviewed proposed updates to two district policies in first-read presentations: GBEBB (staff conduct with students) and JLIF (sex-offender notification). District staff said the updates align with recent statutory changes.
On GBEBB, staff presented an addition referencing a state law (House Bill 2310) that adds language addressing grooming and child enticement. Board member Van Hook said the board should go further than a statutory citation and asked that the second read include explicit policy language forbidding staff from requesting or encouraging students to share explicit images, a clear definition of electronic communication and visual depictions, a requirement that suspected violations be reported immediately to law enforcement, and annual staff training. District staff responded that they would accept recommended policy language and bring it back for a second read.
On JLIF (*** offender notification), staff said the statutory categories of offenders have been updated to add a category for certain convictions involving crimes against children and that the policy recommendation would require notification to schools when an offender has legal custody of a student. A board member asked whether local law enforcement notifications could be required within 45 days of the offender's presence in the area and whether notifications could be distributed in non-electronic formats; staff said they would consult legal counsel and cabinet to determine what notifications the district can require and bring suggestions back for a second read.
Ending: Staff agreed to accept board recommendations and to return both policies for a second reading with proposed language for consideration.

