Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Tax Exemption topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Partial property-tax exemption for low-income residents fails after amendments and public comment

3289676 ยท May 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Ordinance 25-047, proposing a one-year partial county property-tax exemption for households with incomes at or below $50,000, failed on final vote after a floor amendment and public comment raised concerns about income thresholds and scope.

New Castle County Council on May 13 considered Ordinance 25-047, which would have created a one-year partial county property-tax exemption for residents with household incomes at or below $50,000, but the measure failed on the final roll-call vote after floor amendments and public comment.

Councilman (sponsor) moved to read the ordinance and described it as proposing a partial exemption for family incomes of $50,000 and under, with a filing deadline of June 1. During council debate members proposed and passed a floor amendment that struck a reference to "veteran" in line 72 of the ordinance text.

A member of the public, Rob Bullock, spoke during the item and urged the council to consider a broader income range. "This tax could be deemed as cruel, financially cruel by the community," Bullock said, adding concern that a $50,000 cap may not reflect combined household incomes and that moderate-income households could be excluded.

The floor amendment passed (roll call recorded as 10 yes, 2 not voting, 1 absent). On the final vote for the ordinance as amended, the clerk recorded 3 yes, 8 no, 1 not voting and 1 absent; the ordinance failed to pass.

Council discussion referenced multiple amendments and several council members asking for procedural clarifications before the final vote. The transcript does not show further revisions to the exemption criteria or a new filing timeline beyond what was proposed.

Because the ordinance did not pass, no implementation details, department assignments or funding changes were adopted at the meeting.