Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rio Blanco County ratifies letter opposing Smart Wolf ballot initiative; local coalition plans response
Summary
The board ratified a county letter submitted to the Rio Blanco Herald‑Times opposing a statewide ballot initiative called the “Smart Wolf policy” and described a regional coalition working on wolf management alternatives centered on local measures and compensation protocols.
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Rio Blanco County Board on May 13 ratified a letter submitted to the Rio Blanco Herald‑Times that objects to a statewide ballot initiative informally called the “Smart Wolf policy” and described local coalition efforts on wolf management.
Why it matters: Commissioners and local stakeholders said the petition drive would demand significant time and money and might not address on‑the‑ground issues the county and western slope ranchers face; the county’s letter urges locally driven solutions and coordination among counties, stockgrowers and conservation partners.
What was discussed - Initiative background: County officials said the ballot initiative’s primary effect would be to prohibit bringing in wolves after a specified date tied to the initiative’s timetable; speakers noted that the date (December 2026 in discussion) aligns with the timing of the initiative becoming effective if passed in November 2026. - Local concerns: Commissioners and speakers representing ranching organizations raised concerns about cost (some speakers estimated initiative campaigns can cost millions), the potential for the initiative to consume political energy and dollars, and the short‑term timing given that translocations may occur between now and the initiative effective date. - Local coalition activity: County officials described a “wolf coalition” on the Western Slope comprised of counties, cattlemen’s and woolgrowers associations and conservation districts working on a coordinated approach that includes compensation, response protocols and local removal authorities where allowed.
Board action: The board ratified the county’s letter to the Herald‑Times with a unanimous roll call. Commissioners said they preferred the coalition’s locally coordinated approach rather than a statewide ballot campaign.
Next steps: County staff and coalition partners will continue to coordinate regional strategies on wolf management, compensation procedures, and community outreach. The board supported further intergovernmental coordination, including planned outreach and training for producers and range riders about recognizing depredation and collecting field evidence for state agencies.

