Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Rehab topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears proposed changes to home‑rehabilitation loans, including smaller loans, required payments and a new minor‑repair grant
Summary
Community development staff outlined revisions to the city’s rehab loan programs: two new 20‑year 0% mortgage products limited to households at or below 50% of area median income, a $2,500 minor‑repair grant for elderly or severely disabled residents, and underwriting standards aimed at expanding access and speeding execution.
Paul (last name not specified), a community development official, presented proposed changes to the City of Wyoming’s home‑rehabilitation programs at the May 12, 2005 work session to address a more than two‑year waiting list and limited contractor capacity.
Key proposals
- Program redesign: Staff proposed two new loan products: a Home Protection Program targeted to specific weatherization and exterior building‑envelope work (maximum loan $30,000; 20‑year mortgage; 0% interest; monthly payments required) and a Home Loan Program limited to health‑and‑safety and mechanical/accessibility repairs (maximum $30,000; 20‑year mortgage; 0% interest; monthly payments required). Both products would be limited to households at or below 50% of area median income (AMI) and would require a lead test before work; a positive lead test would require HUD‑compliant abatement and a licensed contractor.
- Minor home‑repair grant: Staff proposed a $2,500 grant (with a 10% co‑pay) targeted to elderly (62+) or HUD‑defined severely disabled homeowners at or below 50% AMI. Work would be limited to non‑lead‑disturbing repairs (de minimis thresholds apply) and to exterior or other small items not currently covered by local nonprofit Home Repair Services.
- Underwriting standards: Staff recommended standards to protect borrowers and the city, including loan‑to‑value limits (loans would not exceed 100% of current property value), insurance naming the city as an additional insured on the homeowner’s policy, restrictions on applicants with recent bankruptcies or foreclosure histories, limits on liquid assets (more than $25,000 in liquid assets would make an applicant ineligible), and a rule that total housing costs should not exceed 30% of monthly income.
Rationale
Staff told council the changes were designed to expand the number of households helped by reducing the average loan size, opening bidding to a wider set of contractors for exterior/weatherization work, requiring borrower payments to increase stewardship of funds and adding a modest grant product to serve elderly and severely disabled homeowners who need small exterior repairs.
Implementation and funding
The programs would continue to be funded through Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and program‑income funds that are repaid into the city’s housing‑rehab revolving pool. Staff said current program income and the federal funding structure support the proposed changes; the city’s rehab committee (three staff members) would continue to review and approve loan packages.
Next steps
Staff will prepare a detailed rehabilitation manual and revised program materials for future council action. Council members asked for the red‑line manual and the staff said it would be provided in advance of the formal approval vote.
Ending
Council thanked staff for the presentation. No formal vote was taken; staff will return with the full rehab manual and draft program documents for council consideration.
