Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council opts to retain current auditor for three-year contract after competitive review
Summary
Following a review of informal proposals and cost comparisons, the council voted to continue with the incumbent auditor at the current (LSL) rate for a three-year audit contract ending FY2027.
Get email alerts on the Audit Contract topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Rolling Hills Estates City Council voted to retain its current auditing firm for a proposed three-year contract through audits for the fiscal year ending 2027, choosing the incumbent's lower-fee quote over a new firm recommended by staff.
Staff told the council that two firms submitted proposals through an informal request process and that Vasquez and Company had submitted a lower-price proposal than most other firms. At the council's direction, staff then asked the incumbent auditor (LSL) for an informal quote; LSL's quote was essentially unchanged from the current annual fee, at about $3,233,000 per year as presented. Staff briefed council that over a three-year period the difference between Vasquez and Company's proposal and LSL's quote would be roughly $42,000 to $43,000.
In presenting the options, staff acknowledged a common best practice to rotate audit firms on a multi-year cycle, noting continuity with the same firm can be valuable and that agencies often rotate partners or managers to mitigate the risks of a long-term relationship.
Council member Weston moved to continue with the city's current auditor at the price quoted by LSL. The council conducted a roll-call voice vote: Council member Mersch: yes; Council member Wilson: yes; Council member Black: yes; Mayor Pro Tem Deringer: yes; Mayor Piper: yes. The motion passed unanimously.
Staff said it will return to council with a contract amendment to award the audit engagement to LSL and to document the three-year term. Council discussion noted the cost savings cited but recognized the perception issue around long-term auditor relationships and that future councils could revisit rotation if desired.
