Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rules Of Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brookfield Planning Board reviews rules of procedure draft, approves April 14 minutes
Summary
The Brookfield Town Planning Board reviewed a draft update to its rules of procedure, debated posting and timeline language tied to state law, and unanimously approved April 14 minutes by roll call. The board did not adopt the new rules and expects to vote at a future meeting after legal review and appendix cleanup.
The Brookfield Town Planning Board met May 12 and discussed a proposed update to its rules of procedure, with members agreeing to circulate a cleaned-up draft for legal review and to vote on the changes at the next meeting. The board also approved the minutes from its April 14 meeting by unanimous roll call.
Board members said the changes are largely clerical updates to reflect current practice, but they identified a handful of substantive clarifications they want fixed before adoption, including where notices are posted, how site visits are handled, and timeline language for conditional use and other applications.
Members said the draft replaces references to physical posting at “stone corners” with the town website and the bulletin board, adds the administrative assistant as a point of contact for absence notices, clarifies the resignation process (a letter with an effective date), and standardizes capitalization and numbering. “We took out the names of the newspaper, Granite State News or Foster's Daily Democrat,” one member said, and replaced them with a generic “newspaper of general circulation” in places where state law requires publication.
Board members discussed whether the rules should name a specific newspaper or leave the phrase generic. Several members said newspaper publication is expensive and increasingly difficult to track; others noted statute requires publication for certain hearings and advised the board to confirm legal requirements before striking specific references. The board agreed to have Laura (town counsel) review contested language about publication and other RSA cross-references.
The board flagged inconsistent timeline language in the draft on conditional use permits and other applications. The draft at times states the board must accept an application and hold a hearing within 30 days; other passages reference a 65-day statutory deadline (often cited as RSA timing related to municipal action on applications). Members agreed to align the rules with the applicable RSA and asked staff and counsel to correct internal inconsistencies. "We'll make it whatever the RSA says," one attendee said of the 30-versus-60/65-day wording.
Members discussed procedural items that training emphasized: the chair’s authority to set public-comment time limits depending on crowd size, the need to post draft minutes promptly (training advised draft availability within five days), and roll-call requirements when members participate remotely. The draft also adds a reference to Brookfield’s conflict-of-interest policy under the code of conduct and clarifies that the chair or a majority may change the order of business on the agenda.
No final action was taken on the rules of procedure at the meeting. The board approved the April 14 minutes during the session; a roll call recorded the following: Ed Ingalls — yes; Marshall Goldberg — yes; Steven (Berry/Merrick) — yes; Lee Gage — yes; Mark Loughman (participating remotely/excused) — yes; Gus Fratton — yes; Eric/Rich Sacker — yes. The motion to approve the minutes carried unanimously. The board intends to circulate a revised draft (including corrected numbering and appendices) and to seek counsel review before a vote at the next meeting.
The board asked members to send any further edits to staff for incorporation and asked staff to include the revised appendices (standard hearing notices, a generic notice template, and application contact details) in the next packet. Members also discussed adding a flowchart or quick-reference guide for residents that shows which application or office to contact for common requests (sign permits, home-business questions, conceptual consultations).
Next steps: staff will circulate a corrected draft that fixes numbering and appendix items and will forward specific questions to town counsel for confirmation of RSA references and publication requirements. The board plans to consider adoption at a subsequent meeting once legal clarifications and appendix edits are complete.
