Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Sale Discussion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses possible sale of district property; staff to run title search and cost estimates
Summary
Board members discussed options for a district-owned facility that is not sixteenth‑section land, asked staff to complete title work, investigate reversion clauses and provide cost estimates for repairs and insurance by the June meeting.
During Item 6.1, Marion County School District board members and staff discussed options for an underused district facility and directed staff to pursue title work and cost estimates before any decision to sell or repurpose the property.
Board members noted the parcel is not sixteenth‑section land, which simplifies disposal relative to sixteenth‑section processes, but legal and title questions remain. The board asked the superintendent and legal counsel to determine whether the property carries a reversion clause from a prior donation and to produce a legal memorandum describing the required steps to sell or convey the property.
District legal counsel said state law provides a statutory process for selling school property and that the board will likely need to publicly advertise and accept bids; the board retains authority to reject bids. Counsel recommended obtaining title work and suggested a closing attorney be used if the district proceeds to sale. That counsel also said reversionary language in an original deed (if present) could require returning the property to a prior owner and would need to be resolved before sale.
Superintendent Mister Foster (reporting to the board) said staff will walk the facility with maintenance personnel to estimate repair costs, including roofing and plumbing work, and will present a breakdown of insurance costs and estimated repairs at the June meeting. Board members expressed interest in exploring whether schools could repurpose the building before approving a sale, and asked staff to check whether any prior donation language requires reversion when the property is no longer used for school purposes. One board member said an abstract or title report could reasonably be obtained by the end of the year; the superintendent said he would aim to provide cost estimates by the June meeting.
No formal motion to sell was made; the board directed staff to do the title work and produce cost estimates so the board can consider options at—or after—the June meeting.
