Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board reviews Rhode Island’s Housing 2030 draft, discusses zoning updates and new housing fellow
Summary
City planning staff reviewed the Rhode Island Department of Housing’s Housing 2030 draft and board members discussed using the state report as a checklist for local zoning reforms. The board also welcomed Elijah, a housing fellow serving as Newport’s housing planner under a state fellowship.
Planning staff presented the draft Housing 2030 plan issued by the Rhode Island Department of Housing and discussed how the state’s goals align with Newport’s local housing work.
“Like with all of the planning work that we do, the city is, sort of in line with the plans that are above us at the state,” Trish, a member of the city’s planning staff, told the board. She said the state’s timeline and pace for producing housing units is “quite ambitious” compared with the city’s typical planning horizon and that Newport will pursue its City Housing Chapter over a longer period.
Board members asked whether the state goals covered five-year increments and noted Newport usually frames housing work on a 10-year horizon. One member suggested using a checklist-style “dashboard” drawn from the state report’s “menu of pro-housing reforms” (the board member referenced page 35 of the Housing 2030 draft) to track which reforms are relevant and where Newport stands on each recommendation.
The board also introduced Elijah, who joined the planning team through the state housing fellowship program and is serving as a housing fellow and housing planner for Newport. Elijah said he will support the board and staff on housing and zoning matters and that staff will coordinate further work and reporting.
Board members said they plan to bring a status update on zoning changes and other housing work to the City Council in the near future and noted that some zoning updates will proceed incrementally rather than as a single comprehensive rewrite.
The discussion did not produce formal votes; it was recorded as communications and a working-group update. Several members requested regular progress reports and asked staff to map the state’s recommended reforms against Newport’s existing code.
