Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Testing Consumer Products topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly committee hears bill to bar sale of household cleaning products tested on animals, with 2030 compliance date
Summary
SB167 would prohibit importation and sale in Nevada of household cleaning products tested on animals when validated non-animal regulatory alternatives exist; sponsor and scientific advocates said the measure builds on Nevada's earlier cosmetics law and gives manufacturers a long compliance runway to 2030.
Lawmakers considered Senate Bill 167, which would prohibit the sale or importation into Nevada of household cleaning products that rely on animal testing when accepted non-animal tests exist for the same regulatory endpoints.
Senator Melanie Scheibel, sponsor of the bill, told the Assembly Commerce and Labor Committee that Nevada led earlier efforts to prohibit the sale of cosmetics tested on animals and that SB167 extends that approach to household cleaning products. Monica Angebretsen of Cruelty Free International said the bill requires manufacturers to use available non-animal methods when regulators accept those alternatives and that, in practice, animal tests sometimes continue despite valid modern alternatives.
The bill's language was amended in response to concerns from industry about supply chains and certain imported chemicals; proponents said the amendments exempt chemicals imported in large quantities when their final use is not primarily for household cleaning products and narrow the definition of “household cleaning products” to exclude pesticides and rodenticides. Angebretsen said the 2030 effective date is intended to give manufacturers a long runway to verify supply chains and implement non-animal methods.
Supporters, including Cruelty Free International and several individual callers, urged the committee to advance the bill. The Household & Commercial Products Association testified that it moved to a neutral position after the senate amendments and noted the measure intersects with federal laws and regulatory frameworks. No formal vote was taken at the hearing.
Ending: Sponsor and industry representatives said they will continue to refine definitions and compliance timing as the bill moves through the legislative process.
