Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sustainable Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County board committee adopts sustainable design standards to support Climate Action 2050
Summary
Committee voted 5-0 to recommend a resolution adopting sustainable design standards to reduce building emissions and align capital projects with the county’s Climate Action 2050 goals; the standards set tiered requirements, an exemption process, and annual reporting.
The Committee on Community, Environment and Economic Development recommended adoption of a resolution endorsing Milwaukee County’s sustainable design standards, a new toolkit staff say will help the county implement elements of its Climate Action 2050 plan.
Grant Helle, director of the Office of Sustainability, told the committee the standards focus on energy efficiency, emissions and pollution control, and climate resilience for county building projects. Helle described a two-tier system: tier 2 projects must meet mandatory requirements in the three priority areas; tier 1 projects must meet the mandatory requirements plus additional “better practice” strategies.
The standards apply primarily to building projects (new construction and major renovation) and use project size and cost to determine tiering. Helle said temporary structures, emergency repairs and leased spaces are exempt; projects seeking exemption from mandatory requirements would need written approval from the director of sustainability and the director of architecture, engineering and environmental services via a one-page exemption form. Helle said project teams will use a tier-specific scorecard during design and that documentation will be signed off and retained for review.
Supervisor Rosa Langston asked how this resolution differs from a Climate Action 2050 resolution the board approved last month. Helle and co-sponsor Supervisor Anne (first name not provided in the transcript) explained the sustainable design standards are an implementing tool drawn from the broader Climate Action 2050 plan; the resolution was intended to elevate the standards as a tangible, repeatable tool for capital projects and to encourage transparency and accountability.
Supervisors pressed for clarity about upfront capital-cost impacts and long-term savings. Helle said some projects may have higher upfront capital costs but that early integration of the standards into project charters and energy modeling can allow committees and the board to weigh initial costs against expected operating savings. Staff said the architecture, engineering and environmental services annual report to the county board will include metrics on standards implementation, including counts of tier 1 and tier 2 projects and exemptions filed.
Public comment in favor was offered by Kat Claus of Citizen Action Wisconsin, who urged adoption and noted the standards create data for future decision-making.
On the motion by Supervisor Logsdon that item number 2 be recommended for adoption, the committee recorded a roll-call vote of 5 ayes, 0 nos. Staff indicated annual reporting and cost-estimation processes will be available to capital improvement and finance committees as projects move forward.
