Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Healthy Aging Subcabinet topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Conference committee reviews "healthy aging" subcabinet; county and retiree groups urge adoption
Summary
The conference committee reviewed a House proposal to create a Healthy Aging Subcabinet with a $2.35 million biennial appropriation; county leaders and retiree groups urged members to include the proposal in the final agreement.
Get email alerts on the Healthy Aging Subcabinet topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The State and Local Government and Elections Conference Committee on May 9 reviewed a House proposal to establish a Healthy Aging Subcabinet and discussed a biennial operating appropriation tied to the proposal.
The provision — carried in the House side of the state government package — would establish a subcabinet to coordinate state agency efforts on healthy aging. House staff described a $2,350,000 biennial appropriation tied to the subcabinet in the House position.
County officials and retiree organizations told the committee they support the proposal as a needed statewide planning and coordination structure. Gregory Wright, an Olmsted County commissioner, testified that counties lack “a statewide strategic plan to guide the counties as to how to prepare, coordinate, and deliver the programs that will be needed.” He said Minnesota’s aging population “requires a comprehensive strategic and long term plan to address the many issues of aging.”
Leif Grena, president of the Minneapolis Regional Retirees Council, also urged adoption, saying the subcabinet would help avoid a fragmented response across private and public providers: “We need a subcabinet on healthy aging so that rather than stumble into the future, we can clearly see our way.”
House staff explained the provision originated with Chair Ginny Cleavor’s package and walked the committee through the statutory text and the funding line in the House side-by-side. The committee paused the policy walkthrough later in the morning to allow public testimony and did not adopt final language or votes on the subcabinet at the May 9 meeting.
Committee members and staff indicated the item will remain under discussion in the conference process; no formal action was recorded at the meeting.

