Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Integrity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commenter alleges corruption in Republican signature process, names party leaders
Summary
An unnamed resident in a meeting transcript alleged the Republican Party’s signature process is corrupt and named Kurt Bramble and Dan McKay, saying the campaign exposed problems and that delegates will decide on May 17. No formal evidence or actions were recorded in the transcript.
An unnamed commenter alleged corruption in the Republican Party’s signature process and named party leaders Kurt Bramble and Dan McKay in remarks captured in the meeting transcript.
The commenter said the campaign exposed problems with how signatures were handled and criticized party leaders, saying, “All I want is to expose the corruption that’s in the system, and my campaign exposed the corruption in the whole signature process.” The speaker also said, “Kurt Bramble is… crapping his pants, and Dan McKay’s nervous about this,” and that those individuals are “my friends.”
The speaker said they informally follow up with the people they named, describing conversations after raising concerns: “I call them afterwards and say, hey.” The commenter added that delegates will weigh in on May 17, saying, “if we have a Republican party that believes that power is from a top down, and that’s what the delegates say on May 17, I will not cry a single tear about it.”
The transcript does not include documentation, evidence, or detailed examples supporting the commenter’s assertions, nor does it record any formal response from the individuals named or any motion, vote, or staff directive related to the allegations. The transcript also does not identify the commenter by name or provide additional context about where or during which agenda item the remarks were made.
Because the remarks in the transcript are allegations and no official action or supporting documentation is recorded there, the transcript alone does not establish whether the claimed problems in the signature process will prompt investigation or formal action.
