Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Tax Assessments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adjusts tax-assessment outcomes in legislative hearings; payment plan and layover granted
Summary
At legislative hearings the council approved a five-year payment option for an appealed special tax assessment at 671 Cook Ave E and laid over another appealed assessment at 2054 Laurel Ave for further review.
The City Council reviewed two appealed special tax assessments in its legislative hearing segment and took two distinct actions:
671 Cook Avenue East (RLHTA 25-159). Property owner Patrick Wynne testified that he purchased the lot recently, had not received notice of abatement, and had paid part of the assessed charges. Council member Yang moved and the council adopted a motion to ratify the legislative hearing officer’s recommendation but to permit payment of the remaining assessment in equal installments spread over five years. The motion carried unanimously (7–0). City staff told the council today the assessment before them for ratification was $475 for the cleanup referenced at the hearing; the owner had paid two other related assessments earlier.
2054 Laurel Avenue (Legislative hearing item 205-171). Property owner Thomas Fisher disputed a $440 assessment tied to removal of pallets and argued the contractor had removed items from a neighboring parcel and billed for cleanup that did not match the written order. After public testimony, a council member moved to lay the item over for one week so the Legislative Hearing Officer and staff could recheck records and meet with the parties; the council approved the requested one‑week layover by unanimous vote (7–0). The matter was laid over to May 14, 2025.
Context and next steps
Council members and staff emphasized that when the city performs a cleanup under a summary abatement order, there is a legal and administrative process before assessments are placed on the property tax roll. The council’s motions preserved the legislative hearing officer’s authority while allowing practical accommodations: a multi-year payment plan in the Wynne case, and short administrative review in the Fisher case.
Ending
Both hearings were continued or resolved in a manner that keeps the city’s abatement process intact but gives individual property owners additional options for resolution. Interested parties were told to follow up with Legislative Hearing Officer Marcia Morman’s office and the city clerk for next steps.
