Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline And Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent urges strict ‘phones-off’ policy; board asks staff to research for June
Summary
At the May 13 Kingman Unified School District board meeting a parent urged a districtwide phones-off policy for 2025–26; the board asked staff to bring more information and discuss logistics at the June meeting.
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline And Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A parent urged the Kingman Unified School District Governing Board on May 13 to adopt a districtwide “phones-off” policy beginning in the 2025–26 school year, saying locked storage and signed contracts would reduce distraction, cyberbullying and anxiety and improve academic performance.
The request came during the meeting’s Call to the Public. The speaker asked the board to require students to place phones in locked drawers or phone lockers, turn them off and keep them out of sight during the school day, and to attach sanctions and a signed cell‑phone contract for students.
The speaker cited research linking in-class phone use to lower academic scores and said schools that fully lock phones have reported improved well‑being and a stronger sense of community among students. The speaker recommended the district adopt the policy as soon as possible.
Board members responded by asking staff to research logistics and existing legislation and report back. President Henry and other board members noted safety and operational concerns raised by parents and trustees—examples mentioned included the need for phone access during emergency situations and the role of tracking apps—so the board requested that the item be placed on the June agenda for formal discussion.
Board member comments also referenced models in other districts and possible technical solutions such as desk pouches or lockers that block signals.
The board did not vote on a policy at the meeting; it directed staff to gather options, cost estimates and legal considerations for discussion at the next regular meeting.
Board follow-up: staff were asked to prepare an informational report for the June board meeting with implementation options, safety and security implications, and any relevant state legislation or guidance.
Community members who want to submit research or examples were encouraged to use the district’s normal public‑comment channels before the June agenda item.

