Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Communications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Panel discusses public-email responses; co-chairs to pilot BCC process and triage standard replies
Summary
The panel discussed how to acknowledge and respond to emails sent to the oversight panel. Staff said automatic sender acknowledgements are not available; panel agreed co-chairs will triage responses and pilot a BCC workflow for one month.
Panel members reviewed options for responding to public emails sent to the panel's inbox and discussed a process to ensure timely acknowledgement while managing volunteer capacity.
City staff advised that an automated acknowledgement function was not available via the current IT ticket response and volunteers would likely generate many automatic out-of-office messages if each panelist used an autoresponder. Panelists discussed two needs: (1) an early, automated or manual acknowledgement that an email was received; and (2) a substantive reply timeline or triage process for meaningful follow-up (for example, standard guidance to refer complainants to the formal complaint-filing process where appropriate).
The group agreed to a pilot process: co-chairs (or designated staff) will handle routine acknowledgements and be able to BCC the panel on substantive replies where the co-chairs think full panel input is needed. Panelists asked that co-chairs circulate substantive draft replies 24 hours before sending when possible so members can weigh in on items requiring panel attention. The panel agreed to trial the BCC/triage approach for about one month and revisit at the next business meeting.
Panelists clarified that routine, administrative messages do not need full-panel circulation, but items that raise policy questions or potential formal complaints should be escalated for panel review. The group emphasized the need to set expectations for the public about volunteer staffing and response times.
