Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Brown Act Attendance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carpinteria council asks staff to draft policy on when councilmembers may attend outside events to avoid Brown Act issues
Summary
Council directed staff to prepare a draft policy to clarify which councilmembers should attend events where a quorum could trigger Brown Act notice and public-access requirements. Staff outlined several options and requested direction on priorities.
City staff at the May 12 council meeting asked the council to provide direction on whether to develop a formal policy for councilmember attendance at outside events where Brown Act limits could apply and, if so, what priority rules should govern attendance.
City Attorney'level staff and the city manager described the Brown Act's basic rule: when a quorum of a legislative body (three or more councilmembers) gathers and discusses city business within the council's jurisdiction, the meeting typically must be publicly noticed, have an agenda and allow public comment. Staff described six Brown Act exceptions (individual contacts, conferences, community meetings, meetings of other legislative bodies, standing committees and ceremonial/social events) but emphasized that whether an exception applies can be fact-specific and could still present risk depending on what is discussed at an event.
To reduce the ad-hoc coordination burden staff proposed several possible approaches for determining which councilmembers attend events that raise Brown Act risks: priority for mayor and vice mayor; subject-matter priority tied to committee assignments; a rolling/rotating list; a first-come/first-served rule; or a random selection process. Council members and staff also proposed adding practical guidance and training about what conduct is permissible at social or ceremonial events and recommended Brown Act training for council members.
After discussion the council directed staff to draft a policy incorporating council feedback and bring a proposed policy back for future consideration. Council members expressed a preference for approaches that prioritize subject-matter expertise and mayoral/vice mayoral representation while avoiding purely first-come-first-serve selection rules.
Why it matters: The proposed policy is intended to reduce unintentional Brown Act violations while making attendance decisions predictable and fair for council members and the public.
What comes next: Staff will draft a policy that reflects council preferences and include a short set of guidance items and training for councilmembers. The draft policy will return to council for review.
Context: The request followed recent questions about how many councilmembers may attend certain public events, and staff said the California Attorney General's guidance and recent legal opinions prompted the proposed clarification.
