Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Chevron Decommissioning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission clears Chevron decommissioning EIR and approves project with pipeline removal alternative
Summary
The Carpinteria Planning Commission certified the environmental review for Chevron's decommissioning and remediation project and approved related permits; the commission added conditions to strengthen harbor-seal protections and require that regulatory permits be provided before work begins.
Get email alerts on the Chevron Decommissioning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Carpinteria Planning Commission on May 5 certified the final environmental impact report (EIR) prepared for Chevron's decommissioning and remediation of the Carpinteria oil and gas processing facility and approved the development plan and coastal development permit for the project.
Commissioners voted 4-0, with one commissioner recused, to select the proposed project plus the Hilda and Hazel pipeline removal alternative. The alternative includes removal of one additional pipeline bundle that had been previously permitted to be abandoned in place.
The commission adopted conditions of approval with two notable clarifications. First, it revised the mitigation measure addressing harbor seal rookery monitoring and protection (condition 10) to require full implementation of the harbor seal protection plan for all project-related activities within 1,000 feet of the seal haulout area rather than only during pupping season. Second, it revised the mitigation compliance monitoring and reporting program (condition 40) to require that copies of all other regulatory permits and approvals be provided to the city prior to commencement of related work elements; the change gives the city an additional check on multiagency permit requirements.
City staff said the certification and project approvals follow a public environmental review process and added that public scoping and subsequent steps were part of the EIR timeline. A Chevron corporate affairs representative attending the subsequent City Council meeting thanked the city and planning commission for the EIR work and said the company supports certification of the final EIR.
Why it matters: The action keeps moving the facility decommissioning toward implementation while adding city-level conditions meant to strengthen wildlife protections and improve interagency oversight.
What comes next: The approvals enable Chevron and permitting agencies to proceed toward construction-level approvals and implementation per the EIR and project conditions. The city will continue to require copies of regulatory permits as required by the commission's revised condition of approval.
Context: The planning commission hearing occurred May 5; the City Council received an informational update and public comment from Chevron at the May 12 council meeting.

