Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Early Childhood Teacher Survey topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board deadlocks on early-childhood teacher survey; motions to revise questions and delay distribution win approval
Summary
A proposed pre-K/K/1 teacher survey drew divided board reaction on May 12: an initial motion to distribute it immediately failed; a follow-up motion to revise survey questions before release passed unanimously and staff will return with edits for board review.
Board members debated whether to send a district survey to prekindergarten, kindergarten and first-grade teachers after a teacher-generated draft was presented at the May 12 meeting. Some board members and staff supported a targeted, expedited survey to collect classroom-level feedback; others said question wording and survey timing (end of school year) required revision before distribution.
Lisa (last name not recorded in the transcript excerpt), who described bringing forward a draft based on teacher concerns, said the survey would gather practical feedback about supports for early learners, especially students with special education needs and behavior-regulation concerns. Jackie Jacobs, Chief Academic Officer, said the draft should be refined so questions are not leading, that staff already run multiple teacher feedback channels, and that surveys must have a clear purpose and an analytic plan to be useful.
During discussion the board first voted on a motion to distribute the current draft on May 12; that motion failed. A subsequent motion — to "revise some of the questions on the survey" — passed 5-0 after board members agreed to collaborate with district staff on edits and return the survey for approval at a future meeting. Dr. Townsville and staff were asked to work with Board Member Lisa to produce a revised instrument for review and possible distribution after revisions; board members suggested aiming for completion before the late-May/June meeting cycle, but set no final release date on May 12.
Supporters of immediate distribution said teachers need an opportunity to voice concerns before year-end; opponents said the draft was long, some items duplicated data already collected, and that the district should avoid survey fatigue and ensure staff can act on the results. Several board members suggested pairing the teacher survey with existing student-achievement and programmatic data that the district already collects.
The board recorded the vote on the motion to revise the survey as 5-0; the earlier motion to distribute the draft immediately failed. Members agreed staff will revise the draft in consultation with board members and return for approval at a future meeting. Jacobs said central-office staff who attended the institute and other professional development experiences would help shape survey items and suggested the early-childhood supervisory team would use the survey responses to prioritize supports and training for pre-K–1 teachers.
No final survey was distributed on May 12.
