Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Zoning commission backs ordinance to regulate withdrawals and postponements of zoning applications, with amendments to protect public comment
Summary
The Lakeway Zoning and Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend City Council adopt a code amendment that formalizes how zoning applicants may withdraw or postpone applications and clarifies protections for citizens who have come to a noticed hearing.
Get email alerts on the Administrative Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lakeway Zoning and Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend City Council adopt an amendment to Title 2, Chapter 30 of the City Code (article 30.08—procedure to initiate a change) establishing a formal process for withdrawing zoning applications and clarifying how requests will be handled.
Staff presented the ordinance language at the council’s request after several recent cases in which applicants withdrew items after public notice had been issued and neighbors had prepared to speak. Staff said the proposed amendment formalizes a process already sometimes used informally, and it requires written withdrawal prior to a meeting in most cases and grants the deciding body authority to accept or deny a withdrawal. The draft also proposed limits on repeated withdrawals to prevent tactical last-minute pulls.
Commissioners debated several topics at length: whether the ordinance should allow one or two penalty-free withdrawals; how to handle postponements; whether withdrawals made after the meeting begins (or after public deliberation has started) should be permitted; and how to ensure citizens who come to a noticed hearing have an opportunity to comment even if an applicant withdraws.
After discussion the commission recommended Council adopt the ordinance with these clarifications: (1) clarify that applicants have one penalty-free withdrawal; (2) treat a developer-requested postponement as equivalent to a withdrawal for purposes of counting allowable withdrawals (to prevent gaming the process by repeatedly postponing); and (3) require withdrawals to be submitted in writing prior to a body’s open meeting (i.e., no verbal withdrawals once the meeting’s public discussion is underway). The commission also requested that staff ensure the ordinance explicitly preserves the right for citizens to provide comment on agendized items even if the applicant withdraws or requests postponement.
The motion to forward the ordinance to City Council with the suggested clarifications passed 5-1. The recommendation will go to City Council for final review; staff and the city attorney noted council may choose to refine criteria further, including narrowly tailored discretion rules for exceptional cases (for example, natural disasters or documented emergency circumstances).
