Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel And Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
North Ogden staff recommend market pay adjustments and a 401(k) match change; council signals support
Summary
City staff presented a market pay study and proposed salary adjustments to bring employees toward the 50th percentile; staff proposed shifting the retirement match to a 4% employee contribution / 4% city match, and the council discussed tradeoffs and retention risks.
North Ogden — City finance and human resources staff presented the council with a market pay study and a recommendation to continue moving the city’s pay scales toward the 50th percentile of comparable municipalities, along with a proposed change to the city’s 401(k) contribution policy.
Context and recommendation: Staff told the council the city’s compensation policy targets the fiftieth percentile for market pay, with existing practice of providing a guaranteed contribution and a match program. Staff reported multiple positions and individual employees remain below the targeted market medians and that bringing pay to market across the organization would carry an estimated FY impact of about $500,000 when salary increases and employer benefits are included.
401(k) change proposed: Staff proposed modifying the city’s 401(k) structure from the current guaranteed 3% plus up to a 3% match (employee putting in 3% yielding city match) to a 4% employee contribution matched 4% by the city (an 8% total contribution where employees participate). Staff said that structure retains a guaranteed minimum while shifting more of the plan toward employee participation, and they estimated the change could modestly reduce the city’s overall 401(k) outlay while increasing employee take‑home pay if employees choose to contribute the extra 1 percent.
Council discussion: Multiple councilmembers and staff expressed support for staying the course on market adjustments to preserve retention and institutional knowledge. At least one councilmember said the city had already committed in prior budget conversations to make market adjustments and cautioned against reversing that plan. Councilmembers asked staff to return with more granular data and offered to review detail with staff before a final vote. Several council members described concern about the potential optics of benefit adjustments and asked that any changes not be perceived as simply taking benefits away from employees.
Next steps: Staff will return with final budget numbers and requested clarifications; council members offered to review the data with staff and the budget committee before adoption.
