Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Atchison County commissioners weigh zoning, moratorium and road agreements after quarry proposals
Summary
Commissioners discussed whether county zoning or a short moratorium could limit a proposed quarry and whether road‑use agreements or other remedies would protect county roads and neighbors’ wells; no formal action was taken.
Atchison County commissioners spent an extended portion of their May 6 meeting debating whether the county can use zoning, a moratorium or road‑use agreements to address residents’ concerns about a proposed quarry on private land.
County counselor Pat Henderson told commissioners that Kansas law gives counties home‑rule authority and specific statutes for planning and zoning, and warned that targeted restrictions are difficult without a formal zoning process. “The board has never had an appetite for dipping its toe into zoning,” Henderson said, describing zoning as “the time‑tested, and the only way that I know of that would be likely to withstand legal challenges to, to land use regulation.”
Commissioners and members of the public raised concerns about damage to county roads from heavy truck traffic, risks to private wells and the potential for long‑term changes to nearby properties. Commissioners asked whether the county could impose a short moratorium while establishing a planning commission and drafting land‑use rules; Henderson said a planning process could be started quickly and that a limited moratorium tied to that process might be possible.
The meeting record shows no formal request from the quarry operator to the county and no signed road‑use agreement was reported. Henderson noted that state permitting (for example, through KDHE or other licensing authorities) is separate from county zoning and that a state permit does not necessarily require county approval. He also recalled prior instances in other counties where road‑use agreements or conditions were included in permitting or licensure arrangements, but said he found no automatic requirement in state administrative regulations that a KDHE permit must be conditioned on a county road‑use agreement.
Commissioners discussed practical interim steps residents could take to document concerns, including baseline well testing and documentation of property conditions, and encouraged staff to gather more information about whether the quarry operator has made road‑use or other commitments in writing. Several commissioners said they wanted the county to explore the feasibility of forming a planning commission, drafting limited land‑use rules and considering a short moratorium so the county could review potential impacts before irreversible work begins.
No ordinance, moratorium or contract was adopted at the meeting. Commissioners directed staff and the county counselor to research statutory options, obtain any updated contact or permit information from the quarry’s counsel, and report back to the board at a future meeting.
