Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Lataw Avenue Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developer outlines Lataw Avenue redevelopment plan; agency asks staff to continue talks

3327314 · May 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Angelo Development presented a preliminary plan for a new urban renewal district around Lataw Avenue — roughly 16 acres of infill with basalt and access challenges — and the board asked staff to continue discussions and report back with next steps toward an eligibility study.

Austin Fitzgerald of Angelo Development presented a preliminary concept on May 15 for a proposed urban renewal district near Lataw Avenue in Idaho Falls, outlining redevelopment ideas for roughly 16 acres of infill property and requesting staff engagement on next steps.

Fitzgerald said the site comprises about two acres west of Lataw and about 14 acres south of Hyatt, much of it with basalt that will require blasting and street-right-of-way rebuilding. He described fragmented ownership and landlocked parcels that historically deterred development. Fitzgerald showed concepts drawn from a 2022 Utah State “walkable center” study that envision higher-density housing, integrated greenbelt connections and limited neighborhood-serving commercial uses.

Board members asked about connectivity, nearby highway-rerouting plans and whether state-owned ramps would be vacated and deeded back to the city. Fitzgerald said state routing decisions are still being finalized and that he and staff will continue discussions with Idaho Transportation and city departments; he said the developer is meeting with city staff on pre-development matters.

The board asked staff to continue conversations with the developer and return with options for an eligibility study or other next steps. No formal vote was recorded; members signaled consensus for staff to keep working with the developer and report back.