Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Change Denial topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission denies Jefferson Street proposal to reclassify commercial lots to single-family homes
Summary
The commission voted to deny a comprehensive-plan amendment and zoning change for 2005–2013 W. Jefferson Street that would have reclassified existing commercial-retail-office land to low-density residential/SF-6 to allow three single-family homes; staff found the request inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map.
The Planning and Zoning Commission denied a pair of requests (CPA2503006 and ZON25-03-0008) to change the Future Land Use Map designation and zoning for properties at 2005–2013 W. Jefferson Street.
Staff position and proposal
Planning staff (Savannah) explained the proposal sought to change the future land use from commercial retail office to low-density residential and to rezone the lots to Single Family-6 to allow construction of three single-family homes. Staff recommended denial because the proposed zoning did not align with the Future Land Use Map; staff emphasized that the Future Land Use Map is a guidance element of the city’s comprehensive plan and not equivalent to zoning.
Applicant comments and surrounding context
Applicant Terry Banks said he and neighbors wanted three single-family homes on the property, noting single-family homes already existed across the street and that the parcel has been under private ownership (previously by a church) and underutilized. Banks said he had built a home recently nearby and offered that small infill would complement the neighborhood.
Commissioner concerns and decision
Commissioners expressed mixed views. Several said they support infill housing in principle but were concerned the parcel’s location and potential conversion of adjacent lots to commercial use could undermine enjoyment of new homes. Commissioners noted limited access to the parcel and that surrounding lots could be used commercially, making the requested residential zoning inconsistent with the city’s land-use guidance. Commissioner Michelle Madden moved to deny the comprehensive-plan amendment and the zoning change; Commissioner Ty Chapman seconded. The motion to deny passed unanimously (yes:7).
What this means
Because the commission found the request inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map, the applicant’s proposal was denied. The applicant may revise the proposal, provide additional justification demonstrating compatibility with the comprehensive plan, or pursue a different zoning strategy. No letters of support or opposition were recorded in the staff packet.
