Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City County Development Agreements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Benito LAFCO reviews draft policy encouraging city-county development agreements for areas in spheres of influence
Summary
Commissioners reviewed a draft addition to the commission's policies that would encourage—but not require—city-county development agreements for areas inside or adjacent to city spheres of influence; the item was discussion only and will return for formal consideration after edits.
The San Benito Local Agency Formation Commission on May 8 reviewed draft policy language intended to encourage city-county development agreements for areas inside or adjacent to a city's sphere of influence.
Executive Officer Jennifer Stevenson told the commission the language is intended to memorialize and encourage interjurisdictional agreements that address development standards, planning and zoning expectations in areas the city may later annex. Stevenson said the Government Code already recommends that cities and counties meet and attempt to agree on standards before a sphere change and that any existing agreement typically carries "great weight" in LAFCO's sphere-change considerations.
The draft policy (presented as a proposed addition to the administrative handbook, section 2.9 in staff materials) is framed as recommended language rather than a mandate. Stevenson said the draft includes a short list of recommended content for agreements—development and zoning standards, planning coordination and related items—but that the agreements could vary from informal understandings to formal memoranda of understanding depending on the agencies involved.
Commissioners asked clarifying questions about how differences in county and city zoning would be resolved in practice and whether an agreement would be formal or informal. Stevenson answered that practices would vary by jurisdiction: an agreement could memorialize processes to reconcile conflicting standards and is desirable where a city is the future land-use authority for areas within its sphere.
No formal action was taken; Stevenson asked commissioners to submit suggested edits so the draft can be returned for potential adoption at a future meeting.
