Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Law Ucc topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Assembly committee votes to pass AB 771 to allow mortgages to serve as fixture filings without exact ID match
Summary
The Assembly Banking and Finance Committee voted to pass AB 771, a technical fix to California’s Uniform Commercial Code that would let a mortgage or deed of trust serve as a fixture filing without an exact California ID name match, aligning state law with the approach taken by most other states.
The Assembly Banking and Finance Committee on a voice and roll-call vote moved AB 771 out of committee with a do-pass recommendation. The bill, presented to the committee as a technical update to California’s Uniform Commercial Code, would allow a mortgage or deed of trust to serve as a fixture filing even if the debtor’s California identification does not exactly match the debtor name on the instrument.
AB 771’s author and supporters told the committee the change corrects a drafting omission when California adopted a 2014 version of the UCC and would bring California into alignment with 44 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Under current California practice, witnesses said, a mortgage or deed of trust only qualifies as a fixture filing when the debtor name exactly matches the name on the state ID; if the names differ — for example because of a missing middle initial or a typographical difference — lenders typically must file a separate financing statement, duplicating filings and fees.
Why it matters: supporters said the bill removes a routine administrative burden and reduces the risk that a lender’s security interest in fixtures (equipment attached to real property, such as HVAC systems or bolted machinery) will lapse because of minor name discrepancies. Saul Perkovich of the California Lawyers Association explained the practical effect: “They’re not the real property, but their personal property affixed to the real property.” Perkovich added the separate filing requirement is “a trap for the unwary” and noted that mortgages or deeds of trust can remain effective for decades while separate fixture filings must be renewed every five years.
Supporters in the room included Raymond Contreras of Lighthouse Public Affairs speaking on behalf of Habitat for Humanity California. No formal opposition registered during the committee hearing.
Committee action: Committee members made and seconded a motion to do pass AB 771. The roll call recorded the following yes votes: Chair Valencia; Assemblymembers Chen, Dixon, Fong, Krell, Michelle Rodriguez, Blanca Rubio; and Assemblymember Schiavo Soria. The chair said the bill “has enough votes,” and the committee left the roll open for absent members.
Background and limits: The bill was described as technical in nature; witnesses and the author framed it as correcting an unintended omission in California’s adoption of the 2010 UCC amendments. Supporters said the change would primarily affect lenders, title companies and borrowers who use fixtures as collateral; the legislation does not, in supporters’ testimony, change substantive priorities of secured creditors beyond the name-matching rule.
The measure passed the committee and will proceed in the legislative process; the transcript leaves subsequent steps (committee of origin referral or next hearing date) unspecified.
