Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pz Rules Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning and Zoning Commission discusses bringing council-style decorum and communication rules to its procedures
Summary
Commissioners reviewed a staff comparison of Planning & Zoning and City Council rules of procedure, discussing decorum, ex parte communications, attendance expectations and withdrawal/postponement practice; no rule changes were adopted at the work session.
At the May 5 work session, commissioners reviewed a staff-prepared side‑by‑side comparison of Planning & Zoning rules of procedure and recent council amendments, and discussed whether to adopt similar decorum and communication provisions.
Staff explained council had adopted more prescriptive decorum language in September 2024 after experience with large, contested public hearings; items discussed for possible P&Z adoption included limits on signage in chambers, limits on speaker time when many speakers appear, and a clearer ex parte communications policy. Staff said the commission’s rules already include a requirement to disclose private communications that might pertain to items the commission will vote on, a provision updated in November 2021, and staff recommended clarifying when commissioners should forward communications to staff so all commissioners have equal access to information.
Commissioners asked practical questions about the scope of ex parte disclosure — for example, whether informal conversations with council members in non‑P&Z settings would need to be forwarded to staff (staff said the requirement is intended for communications that bear on a pending case and that routine non‑case conversations need not be reported). Commissioners also discussed attendance standards: council adopted a 75% attendance expectation, and staff noted attendance tracking procedures currently in use.
Other points of discussion included the commission’s discretion when an applicant is absent (P&Z can postpone or act, unlike council where a higher vote threshold applies), public-hearing time limits (P&Z gives five minutes per applicant and per supporter/opponent by rule, while council recently reduced public speaker time in zoning cases), and whether the commission wanted to adopt council‑style limits on signs and other meeting decorum. Commissioners asked staff to bring a draft of specific rule amendments for a future meeting; staff said that a side‑by‑side comparison is in the packet and will be brought back with proposed language for commissioners to consider.
