Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retail Cannabis Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lynnwood Council asks staff to study retail cannabis zoning, buffers and security; public‑safety briefing requested
Summary
City planners briefed the Lynnwood City Council on May 5 about a Planning Commission recommendation to permit retail cannabis in three zones subject to distance buffers and standards; the council asked staff to return with maps, crime data and enforcement guidance in June.
City planning staff and the Planning Commission’s recommendation on retail cannabis zoning drew detailed council discussion at the May 5 Lynnwood City Council work session, and the council directed staff to research several land‑use and public‑safety issues and return June 16.
Planning Manager Carl Almgren and Principal Planner Rebecca Samuels summarized the Planning Commission recommendation to allow retail cannabis in Highway 99 Mixed‑Use, General Commercial and Alderwood zones with required landscaping, parking and standard retail requirements. The commission recommended a minimum 1,000‑foot buffer from certain “restricted entities” in the Highway 99 Mixed‑Use and General Commercial zones, a reduced 300‑foot minimum in the Alderwood zone for certain restricted entities, and a re‑evaluation of the city center after Townsquare Park is complete.
“Local jurisdictions have the ability to determine which zones retail cannabis can be located,” Samuels said, noting that the Liquor and Cannabis Board (LCB) sets statewide minimum separation rules (for example, a 1,000‑foot buffer from schools and certain youth‑serving facilities) but that cities may add additional restrictions or modify buffers for some entity types where state law allows it.
Council members asked staff to return with several items for the June meeting: map visualizations showing the effect of different buffer distances (300 feet, 1,000 feet and alternatives), comparisons to neighboring cities’ ordinances, crime and enforcement data (including experience from nearby jurisdictions), clarity on whether Townsquare Park and Village Green should be treated as future restricted sites, and options for license caps or preferences for social‑equity/small‑business applicants.
There was substantial discussion about security measures (bollards), advertising controls, and whether local regulation can address high‑potency products. Planning staff said bollards are commonly used by retail businesses and that the Planning Commission did not recommend a blanket city requirement because businesses often harden storefronts themselves; they also said the LCB controls product labeling and many advertising rules, though recent legislation shifts some advertisement enforcement responsibilities to local jurisdictions with an effective date next January.
Council member Ryan Decker observed that a 300‑foot buffer is a short distance in urban parcels and used the Alderwood Boys & Girls Club to illustrate how a 300‑foot radius would affect nearby commercial parcels. Planning staff agreed to run parcel‑level buffers and show how parcels would be excluded under different buffer choices.
Council members requested that Chief Langdon or a Lynnwood Police Department representative be invited to June meetings to explain enforcement expectations, public‑consumption rules and any operational recommendations for clustering or dispersing retail outlets. Staff said they would also seek input from the LCB.
The council did not vote on an ordinance; staff will return with maps, legal references, enforcement input and options for license limits or prioritization at the June 16 work session.
